X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <45EF36D7.7000701@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:04:07 +0100
From: Christian Franke <Christian DOT Franke AT t-online DOT de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin speed
References: <45E86FFD DOT 7060301 AT princeton DOT edu> <45E876FA DOT 7401B017 AT dessent DOT net> <20070305011713 DOT GG6734 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com> <45EF1CED DOT 608 AT t-online DOT de> <loom DOT 20070307T221839-665 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20070307T221839-665@post.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ID: SOU5oyZ1QegBaiPXvPuzIDWsZlwop83L+-imEz81lonflSa25RGfwy
X-TOI-MSGID: e4939601-fb81-4d43-a71d-26d14ba9f76b
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Blake wrote:
> ...
> And the way I see it, if the mask is unchanged, then any signal that was 
> unblocked before calling sigprocmask() should have already fired.  In other 
> words, the only signals that sigprocmask() HAS to worry about are signals that 
> just changed to unmasked;...
>   

To handle this case, wouldn't it be necessary to call 
sig_dispatch_pending() *after* set_signal_mask() has unblocked the signal?

Christian


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/