X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:18:49 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Danny Smith Subject: Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc? Message-ID: <20070201121849.GC29751@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Danny Smith References: <20070131131337 DOT GA17256 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <000001c745ba$8496d6e0$744861cb AT anykey> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001c745ba$8496d6e0$744861cb@anykey> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:36:17PM +1300, Danny Smith wrote: >cgf wrote >> >> How about if we eliminate -mno-cygwin from future releases and either >> provide our own mingw cross-tools or wrap the offerings from >> mingw.org? > > >I would miss -mno-cygwin. Gcc -mno-cygwin suppports symlinks, mingw >doesn't. > >--host=i686-pc-cygwin --target=i686-pc-cygwin would be a lovely >replacement, > so I wouldn't miss it for long. Yes, I think we've concluded that we can't just wrap the MinGW version of gcc. It has to be a real cross-compiler. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/