X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <002201c6e319$9665f670$c704d98d@cit.wayne.edu> From: "Lee Maschmeyer" To: Subject: re: reading directory .: No such file or directory Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:17:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mirapointmr2.wayne.edu X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090202.451BF588.0085,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=141.217.4.199, so=2006-03-30 10:46:40, dmn=5.2.113/2006-07-26 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I've never had ls say it can't read ., but I do remember having path completion problems. I think that's why I use symbolic links instead of mount for drives; something like: cd / ln -s /cygdrive/c etc. Then I just cd /c and seldom have to use /cygdrive at all. I'm sure somebody will explain why this is a bad idea, which is one reason I'm responding here. But it does seem to muddle through... -- Lee Maschmeyer "Be kind to your fur-bearing friends, For a skunk may be somebody's brother." --Fred Allen -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/