X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: RE: Windows 95 support ? Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:54:59 -0500 Message-ID: <003101c66774$632f0150$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20060421113800.GB19664@calimero.vinschen.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > From: Corinna Vinschen > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 6:38 AM > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: Windows 95 support ? > > On Apr 21 12:59, Samuel Thibault wrote: [snip] > > Ok, but the question remains: does cygwin still target windows 95? > > Just the setup tool has some problem, apparently. > Cygwin still runs on 95, which will probably change at one > point, since it's getting incredibly awkward to support it. > > > Corinna > Perhaps, but as long as the Cygwin DLL etc do support 95, it seems that Setup should be self contained and not require W95 users (all dozen of them ;-)) to hunt down DLLs all over the internet. Perhaps I'll whip up a regular Setup installer which includes the necessary redistributables. Mr. Thibault, do you have any interest in helping test out whatever I come up with? I haven't had access to a Win95 machine since... well, pretty much forever in PC-years, so the only testing I could do myself would be that it doesn't wreck anything with XP Pro and Home, and maybe ME if I can ressurect that machine. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/