Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dave Korn" To: Subject: RE: Anyone running spfd on Cygwin? (Attn: cygrunsrv maintainer) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:16:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: ----Original Message---- >From: Igor Pechtchanski >Sent: 16 August 2005 02:22 > On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Herb Martin wrote: >> Or must such services be stopped and restarted completely? > > Yes, but you'll need to send SIGHUP to the program process, and not to the > corresponding cygrunsrv process, since, IIRC, cygrunsrv itself will > unconditionally terminate the child daemon on SIGHUP (and SIGTERM, and > SIGQUIT, and SIGINT). > > Corinna, perhaps cygrunsrv should pass explicit SIGHUPs to the child > instead (unless --termsig is HUP)? Or, better yet, pass the signal to > send as an argument to terminate_child()? I think that if someone wants to send a signal to the child, they should send it to the child, and if someone wants to send a signal to the parent, they should send it to the parent, and I don't think cygrunsrv should try to second guess them. And stop calling me Corinna! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/