Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:30:14 -0400
From: tom AT nsa DOT org
To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: RFE: removing symbolic link / windows shortcut duality
Message-ID: <20050812203014.GD24621@nsa.org>
References: <20050812171651 DOT GW24621 AT nsa DOT org> <6 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 20050812150046 DOT 03d74dd8 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050812150046.03d74dd8@pop.prospeed.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i


On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 03:06:03PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
> You should take a look through the email archives if you're interested in 
> starting some discussion on this topic.  It has come up before, as well as
> the notion of using Windows reparse points in some similar way.  There are 
> good reasons for the way things work now.  You can get a better 
> understanding of these important points by reviewing that history.

Thanks for the reply. I did some casual keyword searching, but
didn't turn up anything. I'll check it out.

-- 
/t

mailto:tom AT nsa DOT org

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/