Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <425372AF.7070208@x-ray.at> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:25:03 +0200 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Unusual new look to symlinks to executables References: <040520052315 DOT 15459 DOT 42531C000005BAFE00003C6322069984990A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> In-Reply-To: <040520052315.15459.42531C000005BAFE00003C6322069984990A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Eric Blake schrieb: ... > Below is the table of how I think ln(1) ought to behave (I'm open to > suggestions if others think differently). Where ln(1) does not actually behave > this way, I am open to help in patching coreutils to provide the desired > functionality. Hopefully my webmail interface didn't screw up this table too > badly. > > existing: a a.exe both neither > ln a b 1 4 4 0 > ln a.exe b 0 2 2 0 > ln a b.exe 3 4 4 0 > ln a.exe b.exe 0 4 4 0 > ln -s a b 5 6 5 7 > ln -s a.exe b 9 8 8 9 > ln -s a b.exe 10 11 10 12 > ln -s a.exe b.exe 14 13 13 14 > > results: > 0. error > 1. b is hardlink to a > 2. b is hardlink to a.exe > 3. b.exe is hardlink to a > 4. b.exe is hardlink to a.exe > 5. b is symlink, readlink b gives a, resolves to a > 6. b is symlink, readlink b gives a, resolves to a.exe > 7. b is symlink, readlink b gives a, dangling link > 8. b is symlink, readlink b gives a.exe, resolves to a.exe > 9. b is symlink, readlink b gives a.exe, dangling link > 10. b.exe is symlink, readlink b.exe gives a, resolves to a > 11. b.exe is symlink, readlink b.exe gives a, resolves to a.exe > 12. b.exe is symlink, readlink b.exe gives a, dangling link > 13. b.exe is symlink, readlink b.exe gives a.exe, resolves to a.exe > 14. b.exe is symlink, readlink b.exe gives a.exe, dangling link > > I guess one final question is whether cygwin's readlink(2) should be allowed to > append .exe if that's what the symlink currently resolves to, or if it should > always return exactly what is contained in the link. My table above assumes > that readlink(2) does not auto-append .exe when resolving a symlink. > > -- > Eric Blake > (coreutils maintainer) Eric, Just a big thank you, that you are doing a really great job! -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban http://phpwiki.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/