Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: Kelley Cook <kcook AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org>
Cc: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, gcc-patches AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org
Subject: Re: [toplevel, Cygwin] Don't warn if both newlib and winsup are missing
References: <416C0931 DOT 90006 AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org>
From: Zack Weinberg <zack AT codesourcery DOT com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:24:48 -0700
In-Reply-To: <416C0931.90006@gcc.gnu.org> (Kelley Cook's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:41:21 -0400")
Message-ID: <87y8ibu9wf.fsf@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Kelley Cook <kcook AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org> writes:

> In July a patch was added to the Cygwin's toplevel that turns off newlib 
> if winsup isn't also present.

Hang on, is this even the right thing?  Aren't there embedded targets
that use newlib but not winsup?

zw

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/