Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <e9686dd60409240739566dd279@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:39:29 -0500
From: Gabe Rosenhouse <gabriel DOT i DOT r AT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: Gabe Rosenhouse <gabriel DOT i DOT r AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Inheriting parent ACLs?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0409231817400.7682@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <e9686dd604092311424a08a8d6 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0409231643310 DOT 2707 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20040923210113 DOT GP12802 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0409231718100 DOT 7682 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <e9686dd60409231432258a067c AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0409231817400 DOT 7682 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:19:21 -0400 (EDT), Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gabe Rosenhouse wrote:
...
> > sorry if I'm misunderstanding this, but are you saying that ntsec =>
> > NTFS-like ACL inheritance?
> 
> Actually the opposite.  Adding "nontsec" to your CYGWIN environment
> variable (see the first link in the above URL) will do that.  Using
> "ntsec" will simulate POSIX permissions using the NT ACLs, and will not
> use inheritance.

Thanks.
Is there something I can read that contrasts the functionality
implications of ntsec vs nontsec? 
http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html doesn't go into details on
the differences between the two settings.
One question specifically is, under nontsec, will domain users will
still be able to login via SSH and be recognized as members of their
domain groups?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/