Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:59:23 +0200 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" Reply-To: "Gerrit @ cygwin" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere Message-ID: <122925117.20040920155923@familiehaase.de> To: Dalibor Topic CC: "Gerrit @ cygwin" , "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" Subject: Re: Cygwin-specific Libtool patches In-Reply-To: <414EAA70.2090700@kaffe.org> References: <20040906021844 DOT 84591 DOT qmail AT web53304 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1095382062 DOT 1234 DOT 164 DOT camel AT gadek DOT homelinux DOT org> <1729140505 DOT 20040917144223 AT familiehaase DOT de> <1095453892 DOT 21655 DOT 265 DOT camel AT glue> <1902690 DOT 20040918145110 AT familiehaase DOT de> <414EAA70 DOT 2090700 AT kaffe DOT org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Hallo Dalibor, Am Montag, 20. September 2004 um 12:01 schriebst du: > I was wondering whether you know if there are pending patches from > Cygwin developers for GNU Libtool, as they are preparing Libtool 2.0, so > it would be nice to have those included, if possible :) The Libtool > upstream is very cooperative and responsive to patches in my experience. If our libtool maintainer and his family survived Ivan I'm pretty sure that he will submit pending patches timely. Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/