Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:00:32 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.5.10: expr + configure failure + testcase (also on 1.5.11-1) Message-ID: <20040914130032.GC32582@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <90459864DAD67D43BDD3D517DEFC2F7D7114 AT axon DOT Axentia DOT local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <90459864DAD67D43BDD3D517DEFC2F7D7114@axon.Axentia.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:11:39AM +0200, Peter Ekberg wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I was thinking the same thing but AFAIK, ash doesn't have the pid >>recycling problem. > >Don't know where ash comes into play, the script is executed by bash. >I must have missed some other test case... Remember this? >On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 03:05:01AM -0400, Bogdan Vacaliuc wrote: >>4) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00449.html >> thru http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00556.html >> >>This relates to Manfred Spraul's patch for bash related to RECYCLES_PIDS. I >>have observed the failure to occur under (a)sh, and bash 2.04.5, 2.05b and **** >>3.00.0 ( I compiled them all, including enabling the RECYCLES_PIDS for bash >>2.05b ). cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/