Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:07:24 -0500
From: Mike <mikee AT mikee DOT ath DOT cx>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Why umount -A is a really bad idea
Message-ID: <20040825210724.GG29527@mikee.ath.cx>
References: <412CFBCB DOT 3040808 AT breame DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <412CFBCB.3040808@breame.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Organization: The Math Forum
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Colin JN Breame wrote:

> I tried this once, just to see what would happen.  I then spent the next 
> hour restoring the mount points.  I've learnt a valuable lesson...

Why would a 'mount -a' not work after your 'umount -a' to restore the mounts?

Mike

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/