Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <000701c48007$1b69c720$78d96f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk> From: "Max Bowsher" To: References: <038701c47ff5$2506bc50$78d96f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <1042285252 DOT 20040812024734 AT familiehaase DOT de> Subject: Re: Perl packaging suggestion - vendor_perl Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:55:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-IsSubscribed: yes Note-from-DJ: This may be spam Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hallo Max, > > Am Donnerstag, 12. August 2004 um 00:47 schriebst du: > >> Would it be possible to package the extra modules included in the Cygwin >> perl package in the vendor_perl hierarchy? > > Sure, this is obviously a good thing. Thanks! I look forward to 5.8.6 or whatever. >> This would leave the site_perl hierarchy clear for site additions, and allow >> site additions to be purged without affecting parts of the package. > > More interesting is that you can install your own version which goes > to site_perl and overrides the distributed version in vendor_perl > which is last path in the search order. I've never understood that. It seems to me that "site, vendor, core" would be a better order - to allow core modules to be upgraded by a package. Or am I missing something? Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/