Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:23:01 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: C99 complex numbers in cygwin? Message-ID: <20040715202301.GB12288@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20040715175204 DOT 15AA2101D9 AT ws1-3 DOT us4 DOT outblaze DOT com> <6 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 0 DOT 20040715161230 DOT 033b7530 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.0.20040715161230.033b7530@pop.prospeed.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 04:13:16PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: >At 01:52 PM 7/15/2004, you wrote: >>From: "Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)" >>> gcc uses the complex math functions from the system libraries, >>> (excluding builtins). They aren't in newlib, so cygwin doesn't have them. >>> >>> I, too, would like them as they are required by gfortran, which will be >>> (is) the fortran compiler in gcc-3.5. >> >>UPDATE: This just in... >> >>http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.1/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#Other%20Builtins >> >>"The ISO C99 functions ... cabsf, cabsl, cabs, cacosf, cacoshf, cacoshl, >>cacosh, cacosl, cacos, cargf, cargl, carg, casinf, casinhf, casinhl, >>casinh, casinl, casin, catanf, catanhf, catanhl, catanh, catanl, catan, >>cbrtf, cbrtl, cbrt, ccosf, ccoshf, ccoshl, ccosh, ccosl, ccos, cexpf, >>cexpl, cexp, cimagf, cimagl, cimag, conjf, conjl, conj,..., cpowf, >>cpowl, cpow, cprojf, cprojl, cproj, crealf, creall, creal, csinf, csinhf, >>csinhl, csinh, csinl, csin, csqrtf, csqrtl, csqrt, ctanf, ctanhf, ctanhl, >>ctanh, ctanl, ctan ... are handled as built-in functions except in strict >>ISO C90 mode (-ansi or -std=c89)." >> >>Sounds like I just need to wait for gcc 3.4. Is there a build of it >>available for cygwin yet? > >No. Gerrit said maybe sometime in August. Can we get August moved up to next week, maybe? Back in B20 days, we'd August the complex numbers all of the time so that they would be available ASAP. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/