Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <1089134129.40eade314e1d4@imp4-q.free.fr>
Date: Tue,  6 Jul 2004 19:15:29 +0200
From: richard DOT dje AT free DOT fr
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Entry point *main* can't be found in cygpango-1.0-0.dll
References: <1089115526 DOT 40ea9586c1063 AT imp DOT free DOT fr> <541157566813 DOT 20040706170131 AT familiehaase DOT de> <1089130331 DOT 40eacf5b67b16 AT imp4-q DOT free DOT fr> <1771162605108 DOT 20040706182529 AT familiehaase DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <1771162605108.20040706182529@familiehaase.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Selon "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>:

> richard wrote:
> 
> > Selon "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de>:
> 
> >> richard wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Hello,
> >> 
> >> > After i downloaded Gerrit P. Haase new packages (glib2, pango,
> atk
> >> and
> >> > gtk2), i compiled GVIM and each time i try to launch the
> generated
> >> > executable be it VIM or GVIM i get an error message saying that
> >> entry
> >> > point *main* couldn't be found in cygpango-1.0-0.dll.
> >> 
> >> > I attached the output of *cygcheck -srv > cygcheck_log.txt*
> >> 
> >> According to this output you have another version of pango
> installed
> >> in
> >> /usr/local/lib:
> >>   587k 2004/05/12
> >> D:\users\dje\cyginstall\usr\local\bin\cygpango-1.0-0.dll - os=4.0
> >> img=1.0 sys=4.0
> >>                   "cygpango-1.0-0.dll" v0.0 ts=2004/5/12 13:25
> >> /usr/lib:
> >>   187k 2004/06/30 D:\users\dje\cyginstall\bin\cygpango-1.0-0.dll
> -
> >> os=4.0 img=1.0 sys=4.0
> >>                   "cygpango-1.0-0.dll" v0.0 ts=2004/6/30 19:49
> >> 
> >> Your PATH setting shows that /bin comes at first before
> >> /usr/local/bin:
> >> Path:   D:\users\dje\cyginstall\bin
> >> [...]
> >>         D:\users\dje\cyginstall\usr\local\bin
> >> 
> >> But that doesn't mean that you have linked against the correct
> >> version
> >> of the import library.  Please try to remove pango from
> >> /usr/local/lib &
> >> /usr/local/bin and also the includes from
> >> /usr/local/include/pango-1.0
> >> and build VIM again (from scratch).
> > SHame on ME, i was the culprit. After i followed your advices by
> > removing *bin*, *lib* and *include* directories of the OLD version
> > of pango, the building of GVIM went FINE.
> 
> > Now i have a *pretty nice* GVIM interface :), but there is another
> 
> > issue. The problem is that now i am getting the following
> errors/warnings:
> 
> > (gvim:852): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Error loading XPM image loader:
> Image
> > type 'xpm' is not supported
> 
> There is a bug in the postinstall script in the gtk2-x11-2.4.3-1
> package.  Either wait for the 2.4.3-2 package or as a temporary fix
> run
> manually the following commands:
> 
> mkdir -p /etc/gtk-2.0
> chmod 777 /etc/gtk-2.0
> /usr/bin/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders.exe >
> /etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders
> /usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0.exe > /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules

Now the launching of GVIM is Clean, no error, no warnings. Thanks.

> > I don't know if it is related or not but when i open a document,
> the
> > FONT with which that document is rendered is wierd. A consequence
> is
> > that, even with small font size GVIM's window span the whole
> screen.
> > It is not that cool to edit with such an effect (i am NOT
> complaining ;)
>
> What is in your /etc/pango/pango.modules file?
> Maybe it helps to run again:
>
> /usr/bin/pango-querymodules.exe > /etc/pango/pango.modules

After playing with the GVIM font setting (guifont), i looks like
previous errors/warnings were unrelated to the bad font effect i was
talking about.
It look like for 'good' editing one should use a font family of
*Luxi Mono* or *Monospace* with a size of 10, 11 or 12.
I know, I know, it is a matter of taste ;)

 
Thank you for all your feedback.

-Richard



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/