Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:48:19 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Emulating hard links on FAT et al. Message-ID: <20040421174819.GA27830@coe.bosbc.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <00f001c4270e$5db365c0$66fda287 AT docbill002> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:16:03PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> ntea relies on a set of win32 functions available to NT family only. > >Yes, but as I asked -- is that necessary? I mean, if it will require a >full rewrite of the ntea functionality, then NT is certainly a >prerequisite. I don't get what you are asking when you say "Is that necessary?" Are you suggesting that someone could emulate NTEA functionality in cygwin on 9x/Me? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/