Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: PCYMTNQREAIYR
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:12:55 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <NGBBLLIAMFLGJEOAJCCEMENPDJAA.garbage_collector@telia.com>
Message-ID: <NUTMEGRpeVPOEcyhJzq00000325@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2004 09:12:55.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF24C190:01C41892]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hannu E K Nevalainen
> Sent: 01 April 2004 19:54

>  WRT Outlook (not Express) I've come so far that I can tell 
> it has to be a
> redefinition of the "Message" form. Most likely by adding 
> some VB code in
> the Open (or maybe Read) event.

  Ah, that's interesting.  Now that seems quite possible......


>  I know there is a real good reply-prettifier for Outlook 
> Express (it was
> stated to adher more to "standards" the the original). I saw 
> it eralier this
> week, while looking for Outlook enhancement on the matter. 
> Can't remember
> where it was on the net though... (no other details neither, sorry).

  OE-QuoteFix.  Google will tell you the rest.


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/