Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040329102708.03693a38@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: lhall:pop DOT theworld DOT com AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:34:05 -0500 To: Ingmar Sittl , Cygwin List From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: Make problem since 1.5.7 In-Reply-To: <40683E65.7010508@3soft.de> References: <40646A7D DOT 5030801 AT 3soft DOT de> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040326130442 DOT 03f9d138 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> <4067E0B4 DOT 8030802 AT 3soft DOT de> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040329100244 DOT 02855938 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> <40683E65 DOT 7010508 AT 3soft DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-IsSubscribed: yes At 10:19 AM 3/29/2004, you wrote: >Larry Hall wrote: >> >>>Got a SIGCHLD; 1 unreaped children. >>>Reaping winning child 0x108b3a20 PID 1288 >>>Removing child 0x108b3a20 PID 1288 from chain. >>> Successfully remade target file `some_path/GUI_Module.lib_ar'. >>>Finished prerequisites of target file `some_path/GUI_Module.lib'. >>>Must remake target `some_path/GUI_Module.lib'. >>>/cygdrive/c/tmp/tornado2_1/host/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/arsh -M < >> >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> Yikes! You're still mixing tool-sets. That ain't gonna work! >> >> >> -- >> Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com >> RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office >> 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX >> Holliston, MA 01746 >> >> > >The referenced arsh binary was compiled locally for the currently >installed cygwin (cygwin version at compile time was 1.5.6) from the >windriver-provided sources to work around some problems with the >original tornado-binaries. > >The path to AR is set inside the Makefile like this >AR=/path/to/arsh > >Calling this specific arsh from the bash does work, whatever the cygwin >version, so I see no problem with calling it from within make, or am I >completely wrong here ?? That sounds OK. Assuming that this is the only binary pulled in from the tornado distribution, it's not obvious that this would cause a problem. I'm out of ideas at the moment, beyond the obvious debugging. -- Larry -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/