Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <4010BAF7.DF36819C@dessent.net> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:11:03 -0800 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Most mirrors don't have md5.sum References: <40102C93 DOT 1070608 AT kleckner DOT net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Report: 2.3/5.0 ---- Start SpamAssassin results * 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address * [67.160.219.187 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS * [67.160.219.187 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -0.3 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment ---- End SpamAssassin results X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Jim Kleckner wrote: > > I noticed that the mirror site that I am using > via rsync: > rsync://mirrors.kernel.org/sources.redhat.com/cygwin/ > lost the md5.sum file some time ago (2-3 months?). > > An informal and incomplete check of sites from > http://cygwin.com/mirrors.html > > indicates these sites have the md5.sum file: > http://www.online-mirror.org/cygwin/ > http://cygwin.get-software.com/ > > and these sites do not have the md5.sum file: > http://mirrors.kernel.org/sources.redhat.com/cygwin/ > http://cygwin.thehostedbox.com/ > http://sigunix.cwru.edu/pub/cygwin/ftp/ > http://mirrors.theonlinerecordstore.com/cygwin/ > http://sources-redhat.mirrors.redwire.net/cygwin/ > http://cygwin.matrix.com.br/ > http://ftp.univie.ac.at/packages/cygwin/ > http://mirror.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/mirror/cygwin.com/ > > Should it be at every site? I don't understand what you mean by "the" md5.sum file. There is a md5 file for every package. If you open and traverse into the release subdirectory and look at any package dir, there is a md5.sum file with timestamp corresponding to the same date as the packages. In other words, I don't see anything wrong. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/