Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: CVS b0rked?
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:18:16 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401151141220.23399@eos>
Message-ID: <NUTMEGPZJO3vg8lvJFs00000135@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jan 2004 18:18:16.0843 (UTC) FILETIME=[F24EC5B0:01C3DB93]
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Ford [mailto:spamspamspam AT eggchipsandspam] 
> Sent: 15 January 2004 17:50
> To: Dave Korn
> Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: RE: CVS b0rked?

> Please don't include plain text email addresses in the body 
> of messages.
> They are food for spam harvesters.  I imagine this was just 
> an oversight as I think I have seen you remove them before?

  Oops, yes indeed.  Sorry.  It happened because I replied to the copy you
sent me directly instead of to the copy which came via the listserv with the
redacted headers.  So I quoted an addy, but then again you've been Cc'ing
posters as well as sending to the list.  Chalk us up one minor breach of
list etiquette each!

> > > [snip]
> > > > FAIL: pthread/cancel11.c (execute)
> > > >
> > > I don't see this one on NT4.
> > >
> >   I repeated 'make check', and it repeated.

> There should be no reason to rebuild under a different Cygwin 
> DLL version.

  Agreed, unless by some terrible coincidence there's a bug in the snapshot
version that impacts on the compiler in some subtle way.  However that's a
pretty unlikely possibility I agree.

> However, if you did not do a clean build as I suggested after 
> CGF fixed the CVS tree, I would again recommend it.

  Yeh, I just completely rm my obj and install dirs every time.
 
> You could try to debug it :).

  Ya never know, I might just do that.  Is it worth rebuilding with
--enable-debugging at configure time ?  I dunno how much worthwhile that
will actually give me....

      DaveK



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/