Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Alex Vinokur" Subject: Re: gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:57:17 +0300 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 "Igor Pechtchanski" wrote in message news:Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0309220138280 DOT 12411 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu... > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > $ gcc -v > > [snip] > > gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special) // More preferably 'cygwin', not 'cygming' > > This may actually be correct. "Cygming" = "Cygwin" + "MinGW". gcc does > both, you know... > Igor When it is worth creating MinGW executable file, not Cygwin one? What might cause not to create Cygwin executable file (while we are working in Cygwin)? Building executable file for other machine which doesn't contain cygwin1.dll? Are cygwin1.dll and msvcrt.dll essentially different? ===================================== Alex Vinokur mailto:alexvn AT connect DOT to http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html ===================================== -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/