Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:29:10 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: DDD 3.3.5 success Message-ID: <20030904132910.GA19649@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030903082916 DOT 83503 DOT qmail AT web13203 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <20030903133447 DOT GD9575 AT redhat DOT com> <001c01c37230$da38d460$6a567481 AT biosci DOT utexas DOT edu> <20030903174720 DOT GA9457 AT redhat DOT com> <3F562E33 DOT 3080401 AT biosci DOT utexas DOT edu> <20030904085906 DOT GF19365 AT linux_rln DOT harvest> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030904085906.GF19365@linux_rln.harvest> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:59:06AM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: >Personally, I'm not that interested in ddd, but next time, before going >through packaging, I will ask on the -apps list whether the package >will be vetoed.. just to make sure I don't package for nothing. (No >hard feelings, though :) In other words, you intend to follow the proper procedure. Always a good thing whether you're talking about cygwin or not. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/