Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:12:09 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: -x weirdness Message-ID: <20030819001209.GC1899@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <16193 DOT 14627 DOT 802702 DOT 855384 AT scicily DOT montreal DOT ad-opt DOT com> <197-1578450001 DOT 20030818232842 AT familiehaase DOT de> <16193 DOT 19010 DOT 57678 DOT 857942 AT scicily DOT montreal DOT ad-opt DOT com> <20030818221426 DOT GA305621 AT Worldnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030818221426.GA305621@Worldnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 06:14:26PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 05:50:58PM -0400, Benoit Rochefort wrote: >> >> As pointed out, that doesn't explain the matter with >> /usr/bin/test which is also reporting /usr/bin/bash as >> beeing non-executable. >> >That's because /bin/test is still using stat() instead of access(). >Care to fix it? FWIW, the test version of sh-utils (the package that contains /bin/test) for cygwin 1.5.2 should now be using access(), not stat. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/