Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-AuthUser: gerrit:koeln.convey.de Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 23:18:50 +0200 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <186-1579041772.20030818231850@familiehaase.de> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: du.exe v3.5/4.1 or v3.16/4.0: where is the bug? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hallo Elisabetta, Am Montag, 18. August 2003 um 17:16 schriebst du: > Hello. > My problem is about different versions of du.exe that work in a different > way. > Details: > the argument is executing du against a file owned by a different user than > the one running du. > first case: > du > > du --version > GNU fileutils 3.5 > GNU fileutils 4.1 > second case: > du > : Permission denied > du --version > GNU fileutils 3.16 > GNU fileutils 4.0 > In other words, using version 3.16 or 4.0 du fails to execute due to > restricted permissions on the file. What kind of permission makes the 3.16/4.0 versions fail? > What I wonder is why the behaviour changed through all those du.exe > versions and finally what should be the right way of working. Maybe an old 3.16 bug was 'reintroduced by accident' with 4.0? Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/