Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Info: This message was accepted for relay by
	smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication
X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVb2zW5CLxJeDuz2gVYb2K+KBkimkid0HGA4YomUVf6tQPWHR9lNxaat
Message-ID: <3F3FB3DB.4050401@cygwin.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 12:56:59 -0400
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andy Civil <putmyfullnamehere AT hotmail DOT com>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Newbie: Where's ed, vi, more (or less), man?
References: <3F3F7D83 DOT 3030403 AT hotmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <3F3F7D83.3030403@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Andy Civil wrote:

> Hi, a newbie here, my objective was to install Cygwin for a friend so 
> that she could use vi.
> 
> I've installed cygwin successfully, but various fundamental programs are 
> missing, notably vi (or even ed) more (or less) and man (despite the 
> fact that there are 801 files in /usr/man).
> 
> I've searched the packages in the setup program, but vi isn't listed 
> separately, and I installed everything anyway.
> 
> I've tried to search but the package search brings up anything with "vi" 
> in it, like "view" or "divide" or "david" :-) and the gmane newsgroup 
> search says "ignoring common word: vi".
> 
> It would help me if I could know basic information like, should I expect 
> to find vi with cygwin? I thought the main advantage of vi over other 
> editors was that it was found on absolutely EVERY unix system there was. 
> Should I be looking somewhere else for a package? And if so, how do I 
> find which package vi is in, when the word "vi" is impossible to search 
> for.


Yeah, I guess this one is a little tricky given that the package is vim
and vi is a symlink.  Typically, you can limit the search by requesting
the executable name with ".exe" appended but vi is a symlink here which
doesn't have that extension.  The other trick that is usually your best
bet is to append "usr/bin/" to the utility you're looking for like so:

<http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=usr%2Fbin%2Fvi>

I think you should be able to figure it out the proper package from
this. ;-)


> I'm also concerned that I did something wrong, since even "less" doesn't 
> work. This is most odd, since there are scripts like "zless" which 
> clearly expect "less" to be a valid command.


Following the above:

<http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=less.exe>


> As requested in the posting guidelines, here is my output from cygcheck:


We prefer if this information is _attached_ rather than inlined.
Attaching keeps this information from showing up as false positives
when searching for stuff in the email archives.


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/