Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:19:44 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-idd AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: GPL alert ? http://thinstall.com/unix_tools/
Message-ID: <20030728131944.GB32000@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <OF88DF5097 DOT 122509A3-ON85256D71 DOT 0040B101-85256D71 DOT 00413FA4 AT empirehealthcare DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <OF88DF5097.122509A3-ON85256D71.0040B101-85256D71.00413FA4@empirehealthcare.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:52:36AM -0400, Brian DOT Kelly AT Empireblue DOT com wrote:
>Not only that, but this appears to go even further.  By essentially
>"compiling" all these GNU utilities into one executable, there's a
>violation of the GPL to the extent that the code used to do that does
>not appear to be "Open Source".  Double Whammy here.
>
>And by the way - I AM a lawyer.  (Member of the Michigan Bar
>Association in Good Standing).

I noticed that but i was wondering if these were actually cygwin tools.
Has anyone verified that?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/