Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:16:21 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Sparse file criteria malfunction - binutils produces sparse .exe & .dll files
Message-ID: <20030605201621.GA19631@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3EDF9E8D DOT AA452A2E AT ieee DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3EDF9E8D.AA452A2E@ieee.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:48:29PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>There has been very little actual data provided here
>
>Here is some data, using the program from
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-06/msg00321.html

THANK YOU.

Gold star for Pierre.

>I remade the executables in an old version of inetutils.
>The numbers below show that only the larger ones are sparse
>(so the relative overhead is small) and that stripping them
>removes sparseness. 

This is exactly the kind of data I was looking for.  It seems to me that
this suggests that there really is no issue that we have to worry about
in this case.

Out of curiousity, does building the executable 1) without debugging options,
and 2) with the -s option, also result in non-sparse files?

I'll test this myself when I get back to a windows computer but that won't
be for some time.

I really appreciate your checking into this, Pierre.

cgf

>/usr/src/inetutils-1.3.2-21: for file in */*.exe; do ls -l $file; /a.exe $file;
>done
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw         198284 Jun  5 15:23 ftp/ftp.exe*
>Sparse bit 200
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw         508186 Jun  5 15:42 ftpd/ftpd.exe*
>Sparse bit 200
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw         765064 Jun  5 15:45 inetd/inetd.exe*
>Sparse bit 200
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw          76703 Jun  5 15:24 rcp/rcp.exe*
>Sparse bit 0
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw         406162 Jun  5 15:45 rexecd/rexecd.exe*
>Sparse bit 200
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw          71934 Jun  5 15:24 rlogin/rlogin.exe*
>Sparse bit 0
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw          85888 Jun  5 15:23 rlogind/rlogind.exe*
>Sparse bit 0
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw          63796 Jun  5 15:23 rsh/rsh.exe*
>Sparse bit 0
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw          74703 Jun  5 15:23 rshd/rshd.exe*
>Sparse bit 0
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw          43306 Jun  5 15:24 syslog/syslog.exe*
>Sparse bit 0
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw         231526 Jun  5 15:23 telnet/telnet.exe*
>Sparse bit 200
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw         158706 Jun  5 15:23 telnetd/telnetd.exe*
>Sparse bit 200
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw          78942 Jun  5 15:24 tftp/tftp.exe*
>Sparse bit 0
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw          69378 Jun  5 15:23 tftpd/tftpd.exe*
>Sparse bit 0
>-rwxrwxrwx    1 p-humble sw          59463 Jun  5 15:23 uucpd/uucpd.exe*
>Sparse bit 0
>/usr/src/inetutils-1.3.2-21: strip rexecd/rexecd.exe 
>/usr/src/inetutils-1.3.2-21: /a.exe rexecd/rexecd.exe 
>Sparse bit 0
>
>--
>Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/