Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <005701c317f5$00f6da70$78d96f83@pomello> From: "Max Bowsher" To: "Nomen Nescio" , References: Subject: Re: uname -p reports 'unknown' for Athlons? Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:39:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Nomen Nescio wrote: > > >> Who's the sh-utils guru here? :-) > cgf> That could be you! It's free software, remember? > > Cute, very cute, Chris, and yes, we know full well that this > is a (mostly) all-volunteer effort as far as fixing nits, > but that was a very non-responsive and unproductive reply, Well, yours was a very unproductive question. > and it would be more helpful if you could tell us who deals > with bumping versions in code inherited from gnu.org. > (I.E., sh-utils in general and uname in particular.) > > At least, can any of you -RCM's tell us who's the most familiar > with configuration-management issues in that part of the tree? I suggest you spend some time reading http://cygwin.com/bugs.html specifically: MAINTAINERS DO NOT WANT PRIVATE EMAIL. So, asking for specific contact people just irritates. This list is the correct destination for any questions. As always, you have exactly 3 choices: 1) Provide a *good* bug report, and wait for someone to volunteer some of their time to a fix. 2) Fix it yourself. 3) Complain, achieving nothing. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/