Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP: [150.101.195.152]
X-Originating-Email: [tilps AT hotmail DOT com]
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps AT hotmail DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0304301011210 DOT 25128-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Subject: Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 01:08:10 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <BAY2-DAV21SWoBDyseV00008626@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2003 15:09:10.0591 (UTC) FILETIME=[74031CF0:01C30F2A]

> (*) Personally, I think perl support in vim would be nice, but I'm
> absolutely against adding a perl dependence to the vim package.  There's
> no reason to drag in yet another 6.5M of stuff if all I want is an editor.
> If that were desirable, I'd just install emacs.

if 'all i want is an editor' then why get vim at all.
;)

Gareth - no bias here, move along, nothing to see.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/