Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:07:43 -0400 From: "Pierre A. Humblet" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: proposed mkpasswd change Message-ID: <20030411170743.GA635217@Worldnet> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 01:25:07PM -0500, BB wrote: > I'm not sure if this is the correct group for this. > What is the correct group to propose patches to Cygwin? > > As I stated in an earlier post, in order to run cron on Win9x, a SYSTEM user > with RID 18 user needs to be defined in /etc/passwd. mkpasswd was recently > modified to add the admin user. Would is make sense to also add SYSTEM user > also? The only effect of this that I can see is that cron will begin to > work a bit more. Otherwise, I don't think the extra entry in /etc/passwd > will effect any thing. Or (better?) patch cron.c not to call set_cron_uid on Cygwin, as is already the case in crontab.c I don't think it's helpful to setuid(ROOT) on Cygwin. Pierre -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/