Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:57:29 +0300 Message-Id: <200304071857.h37IvTGI017890@beta.mvs.co.il> From: "Ehud Karni" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: spell on cygwin (was spell and nano) In-reply-to: (message from Igor Pechtchanski on Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:58:53 -0400 (EDT)) Organization: Mivtach-Simon Insurance agencies Reply-to: ehud AT unix DOT mvs DOT co DOT il References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Disclaimer: This mail should be sent to Igor, but Igor set the "Mail-Followup-To:" to the mailing list. On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:58:53 -0400 (EDT), Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ehud Karni wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:22:45 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 AT 11:46:34PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: > > > >> ncurses so no termcap files are needed. I think the cygwin provided > > > >> version of nano is far superior as things like spell check would > > > >> actually work, > > > > > > > >This would be a theory - however since no one has ported and packaged spell > > > >to cygwin - it is not yet the (general) case. > > > > I use aspell . I downloaded the > > tarball and > > it compiled OOTB. I added a symbolic link: ispell -> aspell and it > > works perfectly in Emacs (I don't use nano). > > > > Thanks to Joe Buehler for his continuing work on Cygwin Emacs (when > > will we see 21.3 ?). > > > > BTW. CGF - this mail was somehow diagnosed as spam - why ? > > > > Ehud. > > I checked the URL. If you meant the part of how to overcome the "False Positive" part then I already did that. If you meant I was blocked because my mail-server was blocked - I checked, it was not. My mail was considered spam because something in its subject or its text. My speculation is that it was the URLs between < > but I wanted to hear it from people with more knowledge on the subject. May be I was unclear, but I don't think that CGF usual answer ("We are just mean / hate you") is adding any useful information. > > - -- > > Ehud Karni Tel: +972-3-7966-561 /"\ > > FYI, according to RFC 2646, the Usenet convention for signature separators > is "^-- \n" (see , section 4.3). > Igor My email (create automatically by Emacs) has the "^-- \n" as needed, but the pgp signing (done by gnupg) is altering this line. I assume it conform to the RFC for electronic (clear) signing, Please check. Ehud. - -- Ehud Karni Tel: +972-3-7966-561 /"\ Mivtach - Simon Fax: +972-3-7966-667 \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign Insurance agencies (USA) voice mail and X Against HTML Mail http://www.mvs.co.il FAX: 1-815-5509341 / \ mailto:ehud AT unix DOT mvs DOT co DOT il Better Safe Than Sorry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: use http://www.keyserver.net/ to get my key (and others) iD8DBQE+kcoYLFvTvpjqOY0RAmgXAJ9KQLBlYB5kyb7pfzd3TYOpsfMdgQCgi2QT +BbKwtRCDFRpnMJGkB2unaU= =FVVh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/