Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 12:31:49 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Was that the sound of a snapshot going off? Message-ID: <20030302173149.GB441@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030302150634 DOT 102d3b0f DOT steven DOT obrien2 AT ntlworld DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030302150634.102d3b0f.steven.obrien2@ntlworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:06:34PM +0000, Steven O'Brien wrote: >On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 01:38:09 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Please try the latest cygwin snapshot and report any problems or >> successes here. The latest snapshot may be close to cygwin 1.3.21. > >The change to dll_init.cc is wrong. If 1.3.21 is immiment, I strongly >recommend that you back out this change first. At least then we maintain >the status quo until the dlopen/fork issue is resolved. > >The problem on 9x/Me is not that LoadlibraryEx returns NULL; it doesn't. I don't see how a change which checks for a valid error condition could be considered "wrong". cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/