Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:22:00 +0000
Message-ID: <4415-Mon17Feb2003112200+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
From: David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install?
In-Reply-To: <20030214205048.GA62525@ozzmosis.com>
References: <20030214182615 DOT GA20996 AT redhat DOT com>
	<20030214205048 DOT GA62525 AT ozzmosis DOT com>

On Saturday 15 Feb 03, andrew clarke writes:
> ...
> Section 2 of the FAQ might also put people off using Setup because it's
> described as a "work-in-progress" and seemingly a bit of a moving target.

I'll see if I can make this sound less off-putting.

But I also agree with Chris, that the people who read the FAQ are not
the people messing up their installations by not using setup.

Regards,
David


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/