Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:46:00 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [PATCH] TERM=cygwin missing in the output of dircolors from fileutils-4.1-1 Message-ID: <20030205214600.GA11184@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 04:38:26PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >This is primarily addressed to Chris Faylor (as the fileutils maintainer). >I've submitted a patch that includes TERM=cygwin in the dircolors output >back in October 2002 (). >This seems to have been slipped through the cracks. > >I'm aware that we are on the latest version of GNU fileutils, but, as the >patch is specific to Cygwin, would this make it worthwhile to release >fileutils-4.1-2? I haven't seen any complaints about it lately, though, >so no rush, I guess... I'd appreciate it if you would submit this patch to the upstream maintainer. I think that the plan is to get rid of fileutils in favor of a "coreutils", though. I haven't seen a coreutils release yet. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/