Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:59:46 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: getopt_long behavior
Message-ID: <20030130015946.GE4679@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <E18dzmF-0002Lr-00 AT smtp03 DOT mrf DOT mail DOT rcn DOT net> <001301c2c7e8$11fb57e0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030130011501 DOT GB3603 AT redhat DOT com> <00b301c2c7ff$c646c5b0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030130013920 DOT GA4679 AT redhat DOT com> <00d901c2c801$2ebf59d0$78d96f83 AT pomello>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00d901c2c801$2ebf59d0$78d96f83@pomello>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:44:52AM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
>This does not invalidate the proposal "do something at link time to force
>POSIXLY_CORRECT if necessary for this app".

I don't understand what it has to do with anything.  Your proposed
change (which I've already made) will still work.  It will just require
that executables be relinked before there is any change.

To answer the question, no I don't think this calls for a binmode.o
solution.  That would just lend to exactly the kind of confusion that
Larry was cautioning against.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/