Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:00:56 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: getopt_long behavior
Message-ID: <20030130010056.GA3603@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <E18dzmF-0002Lr-00 AT smtp03 DOT mrf DOT mail DOT rcn DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E18dzmF-0002Lr-00@smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:29:47PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
>I orginally posted this message some time ago.  Having all of
>the cygwin tools lacking the ability to accept arguments in
>arbirtary order makes it more difficult to use them(I often do
>grep "string" *.c and then rerun with -i at the end).  Is
>there anyway to get around this without recompiling the whole
>cygwin suite from source code?

No.

>On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:52:01AM -0400, chrismorgan AT rcn DOT com
>wrote:
>>I noticed that getopt() and getopt_long() aren't doing reordering of
>>argv entries.  Searching the cygwin-developers mailing list I found
>>that this is due to compiling with POSIXLY_CORRECT set.  Is there any
>>plan to move back to not setting this variable?
>
>No.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/