Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <000701c2b0c3$df1805c0$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk>
Reply-To: <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
From: <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
Subject: guile-1.5.6-5 mentioned in setup.ini
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:58:02 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

In the current setup.ini (timestamp 1041225613) guile-1.5.6-5 is marked as
[prev] for all three of @guile, @guile-devel and @guile-doc. But it is
presumed [curr] as the source for @libguile14.

(I found this while fiddling around trying to reduce [curr] + [prev] +
[test] to fit on one CD.)

It seems odd to me but I can think of reasons why what might be [prev] for
one package might be [curr] for others. Please can the correct-ness of this
be confirmed by the maintainer? Sorry, and thanks.

Fergus


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/