Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Paul G." <pgarceau AT attbi DOT com>
Organization: Paul G.
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:40:40 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Gcc 3.2 -mno-cygwin
Reply-to: pgarceau AT attbi DOT com
Message-ID: <3E023CD8.30525.1D7AB42@localhost>
In-reply-to: <20021220045501.GA2504@redhat.com>
References: <3E02296C DOT 13888 DOT 18BCFF7 AT localhost>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body

Thank you.

> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:17:48PM -0800, Paul G. wrote:
> >...for as long as -mno-cygwin switch, or use thereof, is not being
> >deprecated...if, however, -mno-cygwin is being deprecated or the use
> >thereof is being "officially" deprecated, then what's the point in
> >talking about it in the first place?
> 
> -mno-cygwin is not deprecated.  It has never been deprecated and it is
> not going to be deprecated.
> 
> cgf
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/