Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: <mhcox AT bluezoosoftware DOT com>
From: "Michael H. Cox" <mhcox AT bluezoosoftware DOT com>
To: "Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: "Anurag Sharma" <anurag AT proximity DOT com DOT au>
Subject: RE: gcc-3.2-3:  bootstrap build fails (HAVE_DECL_GETOPT not in config.h?)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 04:18:38 -0700
Message-ID: <NDBBJEBGAAGAIKPGOOFIEEGLDOAA.mhcox@bluezoosoftware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20021204114533.33864624.anurag@proximity.com.au>

Anurag,

A might testy, ain't he ;-).  I'm sure he's got a lot of things on his
plate, so try to forgive him.  Most of the time he provides constructive
suggestions/advice.

Here's what I've found so far.  Anyone else that has more info/corrections,
please chime in.

There is a GCC PR 8351 (http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl) that seems
to describe the problem we're seeing, although the PR is for release 3.3.
Browsing through the viewcvs output
(http://subversions.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gcc/gcc/include/getopt.h?graph=1
), it looks like getopt.h is fixed in the tagged delta, gcc_3_2_1_release
under the gcc-3_2-branch, but not the tagged delta, gcc_3_2_release aka
gcc-3_2-branchpoint.  The fix is also in cygwin-mingw-gcc-3_2_1-branch, but
not the cygwin-mingw-gcc-3_2-branch.  I'm not sure what version the src
tarball downloaded by setup is, but it doesn't have the fix.  Also, I
couldn't find any tags resembling the cygwin gcc nomenclature, e.g. there
isn't a CVS tag cygwin-mingw-gcc-3_2-3_release for 3.2-3.

My general opinion is that it's better to get the source out of CVS than
rely on the src tarballs.  I've found this to be true with cygwin's gcc and
the cygwin .dll code (although, I'm still having problems building both of
them out of CVS, but at least their different problems :-).

Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anurag Sharma [mailto:anurag AT proximity DOT com DOT au]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:46 PM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: gcc-3.2-3: bootstrap build fails (HAVE_DECL_GETOPT not in
> config.h?)
>
>
> Christopher,
>
> If it works for you. Great!
> The idea of my post was to ask the advice of those people who were having
> this problem. Resolution is necessary for those of us who are having this
> problem.
> I didn't request you in particular to help me, so if you can't offer any
> helpfull hints don't bother.
> I will move on.
>
> Regards,
> Anurag
>
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:35:17 -0500
> Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 05:25:06PM +1100, Anurag Sharma wrote:
> > >Hi All,
> > >
> > >Has there been a resolution to this issue? I can't see any answeres in
> > >the previous posts.
> >
> > No resolution is necessary.  It works fine for me.  I'm the package
> > maintainer.
> >
> > If it doesn't work for you then make some obvious changes to the header
> > files and move on.
> >
> > cgf
> >
>
>
>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/