Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 14:50:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt <matt AT use DOT net>
X-Sender:  <matt AT cesium DOT clock DOT org>
To: <jbuehler AT hekimian DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: re: insure++
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0211101446530.12738-100000@cesium.clock.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Matt wrote:

>> insure++ only supports VC++ 5.x and 6.x on win32. While you an manually
>> edit the compiler configurations, I was never able to get it to work.
>> I've let parasoft know I would like that functionality built in, but I
>> don't think they're moving forward on that. Howver, their C++ Test
>> product does support gcc on win32 now I think.

>It looks like the latest version has a mode that works on uninstrumented
>binaries.  So I have downloaded the latest eval version for Windows and
>am waiting for a password.

Interesting -- I'll have to give that a try; I think that binary-only mode
is called "Chaperone".

I just got C++ Test v2.1 and it has explicit support for Cygwin and
mingw! Can't wait to give it a spin, I'll email the list once I get some
results.

Did you ever get any interesting results from your Insure++ experiments?



--
http://www.clock.org/~matt


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/