Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 20:10:02 -0500
From: Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
Subject: Re: postgresql question
In-reply-to: <003101c28846$1de04340$be6007d5@BRAMSCHE>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-followup-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <20021110011001.GB1592@tishler.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
References: <20021109033025 DOT GD1544 AT tishler DOT net>
 <003101c28846$1de04340$be6007d5 AT BRAMSCHE>

Ralf,

On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:17:05AM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> > Me too.  Sorry, I don't know why the regression test fails for you.
> 
> Do you have done the test with the source of the recent cygwin release
> or are you using a newer release from www.postgresql.org ?
> 
> (I'm using the first)

I was using PostgreSQL CVS.  Although I don't think there would be a
difference (without inspecting the source code), maybe there was an issue
in PostgreSQL 7.2.3 that was fixed in CVS (i.e., 7.3)?

Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/