Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 11:02:39 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: vs and use of diff Message-ID: <20021020150239.GC456@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3DB0CB05 DOT 66E0955A AT yahoo DOT com> <00a801c27812$85f70ca0$5c16989e AT oemcomputer> <3DB287DB DOT E276D67E AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DB287DB.E276D67E@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:39:23AM -0400, CBFalconer wrote: >Peter S Tillier wrote: >> [...] >> > BTW attacking this has shown up a couple of Cygwin glitches. >> > bash won't run a MSDOS .com file, even though it is in the path. >> >> You need to include the extensions for .com or .bat files to get >> them to run under bash - .exe is OK. See the User Guide section >> on Special Names. > >Thanks. I discovered that on re-reading the UG yesterday. What >is the philosophy of that decision? Same philosophy as always. We're very consistent. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/