Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:17:06 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Invisible link? Message-ID: <20020918171706.GA6789@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <00b401c25f36$e607f8b0$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00b401c25f36$e607f8b0$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:08:33PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: >John Carlyle- Clarke wrote: >> Darn -- figured it out about 10 seconds after I hit send. It was of course a >mount. I unmounted, created an empty /usr/lib and >> then remounted, and now it shows in the folder listing. Sorry about that. > >WARNING! This is inadvisable! Imagine... some Cygwin binary tarballs installing >stuff into /lib, others into /usr/lib, depending on configuration and how the >package works. Ditto /bin and /usr/bin. Actually, I don't see any harm in it at all as long as the mounts are set up appropriately so that c:\cygwin\lib == /usr/lib . The existence of a c:\cygwin\usr\lib directory should really not cause any problems. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/