Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dan Vasaru" To: Subject: RE: A Simple Real World Benchmark for cygwin Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:34:11 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-Reply-To: <20020902155542.GC14051@redhat.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal cgf> or investigate the code and offer ways to speed it up. Here's a potential speedup for non-NTFS symlinks: The check_shortcut function in shortcut.c calls CoInitialize/CoUninitialize for *every* .LNK it needs to check on non EA filesystems. I ran a small test on my computer, calling check_shortcut 1000 times. When I moved the calls to CoInitialze/CoUnitialize outside the check_shortcut function, the function throughput increased from 59 calls/sec to 960 calls/sec. As it turns out, CoInit...CoUninit costs up to 20 msecs on my system. So my suggestion is that the CoInit../CoUnit... calls be moved to another spot, to be called once per thread. Dan. PS. This patch made no difference what-so-ever on the timing results of the cygbench configure on my NTFS disks; then again, it may help FATxx/Samba/NFS people. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/