Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 18:56:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Robert Collins cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Setup 2.249.2.5 behavior: uninstalling existing packages if update unselected In-Reply-To: <1030747543.6370.1.camel@lifelesswks> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On 31 Aug 2002, Robert Collins wrote: > On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 08:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > This may be me doing something wrong, but that's pretty unlikely, as the > > procedure was very simple: > > I have setup 2.249.2.5. When I ran it to install a source for some > > package, it offered me to update w32api (I had 1.5-1, and 2.0-1 is out). > > I didn't want to update just then, and unchecked the checkbox, and then > > selected the source I wanted. Setup proceeded to uninstall w32api > > altogether. When I ran setup again, w32api was showing as not installed. > > Unchecing the check box -disabled- the binary of that package. You need > to click on the version until it shows the same as you have, if you > don't want to change anything. > > Rob Oops. The likelihood (see above) just jumped up quite a bit... :-D Thanks for the explanation. However, this was not documented anywhere I could see, so it's good that it's in the archives. It might be good to also have a help file for setup at some point (no rush). Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon. It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/