Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 21:29:28 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: standalone cygwin programs that use "/tmp" don't work Message-ID: <20020825012928.GB740@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3D588AFB DOT 9D17EC0D AT cs DOT waikato DOT ac DOT nz> <20020813124802 DOT W17250 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020817035535 DOT GA15227 AT redhat DOT com> <20020817194410 DOT A5740 AT puriri DOT cs DOT waikato DOT ac DOT nz> <20020817164750 DOT GA1226 AT redhat DOT com> <20020824174911 DOT GC26276 AT redhat DOT com> <20020825110618 DOT A31262 AT puriri DOT cs DOT waikato DOT ac DOT nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020825110618.A31262@puriri.cs.waikato.ac.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 11:06:18AM +1200, John R. McPherson wrote: >On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 01:49:11PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Any news here? >> >> cgf >> >> On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 12:47:50PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 07:44:10PM +1200, John R. McPherson wrote: > >> >>> If you are distributing GPLed binaries like the cygwin DLL, tar, wget, >> >>> etc. you need to also make the source code available. It doesn't >> >>> matter that the source code is available elsewhere on the web. > > >> >Let me restate it: You can't rely on the fact that the source code >> >is "freely available". As I mentioned, that won't be the case for long >> >with cygwin 1.3.10. >> > >> >My suggestion would be to just make the source code available and >> >include a line that says "Please don't use this. It is just here for >> >GPL compliance." or something like that. > >I've made our maintainer aware of the issue, and I think our plan is >to have a statement both on our website and within our source tarball >that if people want the source code to the cygwin binaries we provide >in our windows binary distribution (which we will explicitly mention >package names and versions) then we will provide them with the source >to those versions if they contact us. I'll make sure that this is >included when he releases the next version. I hope this is an >acceptable solution to our oversight. It sounds like it is to me, yes. Thanks very much for the update. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/