Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 13:49:11 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: "John R. McPherson" , Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: standalone cygwin programs that use "/tmp" don't work Message-ID: <20020824174911.GC26276@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, "John R. McPherson" , Corinna Vinschen References: <3D588AFB DOT 9D17EC0D AT cs DOT waikato DOT ac DOT nz> <20020813124802 DOT W17250 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020817035535 DOT GA15227 AT redhat DOT com> <20020817194410 DOT A5740 AT puriri DOT cs DOT waikato DOT ac DOT nz> <20020817164750 DOT GA1226 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020817164750.GA1226@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i Any news here? cgf On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 12:47:50PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 07:44:10PM +1200, John R. McPherson wrote: >>I replied to this to Corinna, but as I got an error message from the >>list server I had no idea who got it or not. So I've forwarded the >>bounced message - see below. > >Corinna's original message had set the Reply-To to the cygwin mailing >list. My message didn't do that but you replied to the list anyway. >Hmm. > >>> If you are distributing GPLed binaries like the cygwin DLL, tar, wget, >>> etc. you need to also make the source code available. It doesn't >>> matter that the source code is available elsewhere on the web. >> >>We have the source code to wget, pdftohtml, etc available for download >>as part of the "source code" download link that is on the website >>I referenced. Some of these packages have been very slightly modified (mostly >>Makefiles). As I said, our project is all GPL and GPL-compatible >>code. > >Ok. You're providing some sources but not all. That's a little >mystifying to me. I don't know why you chose to provide sources for >wget, pdftohtml, etc. but not for the cygwin DLL, tar, gzip, bzip2, or >unzip. > >>We use the cygwin dll as downloaded from a cygwin mirror. So you want >>us to mirror the whole cygwin source code as well, in New Zealand, >>where we have to pay data charges for international traffic in both >>directions? The GPL says that if someone we give binaries >>to asks us for the source code, we are obliged to do so. I don't >>see how we're not complying... > >How you are not complying is that you are apparently not providing the >source code for the DLL and other random binaries. I'm not sure how >this was unclear from my original message. Are you saying that you have >the source code available for such things as the cygwin dll and tar and >that if someone asks you'll provide it? If so, I think you probably >should make that clear on your web site. > >I'm only asking that you make available the cygwin DLL sources and any >other GPLed sources that you are using. The cygwin sources are 3878779 >bytes. The tar sources are 967054 bytes. The other packages (with the >possible exception of perl) are not that large either. > >Let me restate it: You can't rely on the fact that the source code >is "freely available". As I mentioned, that won't be the case for long >with cygwin 1.3.10. > >My suggestion would be to just make the source code available and >include a line that says "Please don't use this. It is just here for >GPL compliance." or something like that. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/