Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: emacs install problem
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: Gareth Pearce <tilps AT hotmail DOT com>
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <F243etVoMDrxxnSYe4n00000c42@hotmail.com>
References: <F243etVoMDrxxnSYe4n00000c42 AT hotmail DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-psGhAomEtJTbVN1uM0S/"
Date: 14 Aug 2002 13:41:21 +1000
Message-Id: <1029296482.11510.181.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-psGhAomEtJTbVN1uM0S/
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 13:38, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> >Eh?
> >
> >All my file systems are NTFS and hence support hard links.
> >
> >But I really don't see what that's got to do with the fact that most, if=
=20
> >not all of Emacs did not install on my system.
>=20
> putting hard links in a cygwin distribution package is a bad idea all the=
=20
> same I would think (especially for win9x'ers).  Possibly could break thin=
gs=20
> in unexpected ways.

Hard links *should* be just fine. setup should make copies of files that
are hardlinks.

Rob


--=-psGhAomEtJTbVN1uM0S/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9WdFgI5+kQ8LJcoIRAoqRAKDV1gOgig2sfDAuCHWRAJGoHnCn1wCfSQfe
nwRA0syp8XNvO4xZuK37/Y8=
=wlZ/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-psGhAomEtJTbVN1uM0S/--