Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: jalonso AT mit DOT edu Message-ID: <1029258934.3d593eb6781fd@webmail.mit.edu> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:15:34 -0400 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: emacs install problem References: <000701c242c8$c1635480$6fc82486 AT medschool DOT dundee DOT ac DOT uk> <3D591E74 DOT 4010001 AT hekimian DOT com> <20020813164742 DOT GQ9193 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <20020813164742.GQ9193@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1-cvs X-Originating-IP: 18.85.46.181 X-Originating-Host: 1cc-dhcp-181.media.mit.edu X-MIT-WebMail-Sender: X-MIT-WebMail-User-Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0) Yes, it's true: "emacs" does not have an .exe extension. The fact that setup downloads the distribution but does not install it appears to be a separate issue. I've manually installed the distribution on my system, and we are getting along quite amiably. Though the default colors (e.g. black on "black"--black on a transparent background, I presume) in terminal mode simply will not do, but that is yet another matter entirely. Jason Alonso Quoting Christopher Faylor : > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:57:56AM -0400, Joe Buehler wrote: > >fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net wrote: > > > >>~> emacs > >>bash: emacs: command not found > >> > >>Yes. I got this with 21.2-1 and I'm still getting it with the recently > >>available 21.2-3. Hard to tell what's going on during setup, but it > doesn't > >>seem to me that emacs gets installed at all. The progress bar flashes for > >>an > >>instant and then it's zooming on to the next thing. Most 'large' > components > >>such as this one take a measurable time ... dunno. Totally perplexed. > > > >I wonder if the lack of a .exe suffix on the emacs binary is causing this? > > > >What OS are y'all running? > > Is this really happening? That would DEFINITELY cause a problem. Windows > 9x > derivatives can't run programs unless they have a .exe extension. > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/