Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <20020716122736.9320.qmail@web21003.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 05:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-3, gcc2-2.95.3-9, gcc-mingw-3_1-20020516-2
To: Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT gmx DOT net>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <142365281.20020716104711@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


--- Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT gmx DOT net> wrote:
> CF> I ran ths release through Chuck's "test suite" and it got most of
> the
> CF> way through building setup.exe before it bogged down in some
> CF> incompatibilities due to some problems with Pavel Tsekov's patch
> (sent
> CF> to me privately) and cvs setup trunk.
> 
> Yes, it was for version 2.249.2.4 - I will prepare a new one agains
> CVS head once I download the new gcc package :)
> 
Pavel,

When you get around to rebuilding setup with the new gcc's, let us know
what flags needed to be passed to setup.  My main question is:  is the
CPPFLAGS option, noted on the setup homepage, still required for building
setup?

Cheers,
Nicholas

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/